Saturday, May 5, 2007

The Fair Tax Is The Best Solution For American Taxpayers

As someone who considers himself a conservative (even if nobody else does), I generally like to concentrate on social issues, the issues that I tend to disagree with other "conservatives" on. There are two main reasons for this

1. I like to argue. If I concentrated on taxes and spending, I couldn't highlight the differences between myself and the Republican party, and have good-spirited debates with other conservatives on the issues. So I agree with a lot of Democrats on a lot of social issues, that's okay with me. Be sure, they'll have their chance to disagree with me, and now might be a good chance.

2. After much thought and some reservations, I've decided to support the Fair Tax. To me, the Fair Tax would solve most of the problems associated with today's complicated tax code, and would give the power back to the taxpayer.

I'd like to discuss the Fair Tax with you. That being said, I'm not going into too much detail, because I don't want to bore you (its figures and taxes, fun!!). I do, however, have resources. ---

Basically, the Fair Tax is an embedded 23% sales tax on retail purchases. This has nothing to do with either state sales taxes, or Social Security taxes. These taxes won't change. But everything you buy (at the retail level) would contain a 23% embedded sales tax, which would replace the income tax.

Q: How did they come up with 23%

A: This is the average income tax embedded into each item you buy. For instance, if you buy a TV for $100, 23% of that went to pay income taxes for the people who made it, shipped it, and sold it

Also, each family would receive what is called a "prebate" from the government each month. This "prebate" would equal the amount of taxes that someone would spend for the basic necessities. If you only buy what you have to, you don't pay taxes (this is where the "prebate" kicks in). If you buy a luxury item, or more than is necessary to live on, you pay a tax on those items.

Q: Will this mean less money will be paid to the government

A: NO, this is a revenue-Neutral tax. The Government should take in the same amount of money. It is also not a tax cut. It is just a different (and simpler) way of collecting taxes.

The Fair Tax would eliminate the need for April 15th (not the day, but the tax deadline) for individuals. It would put business in charge of tax record-keeping and writing the check to the government each quarter. The IRS probably couldn't be eliminated (there would still be a need for some oversight, but not on the level we have today), but it would be reduced dramatically.

Also, that extra 23% that you'd pay for the item would eventually decrease, (the businesses don't have to pay the income tax, anymore and competition would reduce the price). A few years ago, an airline tax expired, and congress forgot to re-instate it. Before the end of the next day, almost all of the airlines had reduced their ticket price by about the same amount as that tax. It only took one company, trying to get a few extra customers, to get the ball started.

Q: Will I still be able to deduct things like student loan interest, and business expenses?

A: NO. You would not pay income taxes, therefore there would be no reason to deduct these items.

Q: What about my retirement, will it be affected?

A: YES. You won't have to pay income taxes on that money, or interest made from that money.

Q: The-G-Blog, you make it sound so simple, is it?

A: NO. I don't have time to go into really specific details. I've linked the sites and books below to help you gather information, and I'll be glad (and I hope some of my other readers that have more knowledge than I do) try to answer any specific questions you have in the comments, but ultimately, you are going to have to really look at the proposal to see what you think.

The Fair Tax bill has been re-introduced in this Congress (Senate S 1025, and House H25). It has some bi-partisan support, but it needs more. Rep Charlie Rangel (D NY) has supposedly agreed to really look at this bill, and he is the Chairman of the Ways and Means Committee, so maybe we can at least have a debate.

Remember, lobbyists don't like the Fair Tax because it takes deduction, and special provision powers away from them in the tax code. Many in congress don't like it because it hampers their ability to spend our money on pork for their district. That should be reason enough to give this bill a chance!!

As always, thanks for the comments. I'm sure I missed something important, so if you have any questions or comments, don't hesitate to post.



FairTax.org

Wikipedia/Fair TAx

Fair Tax Article

Blogging To Change America!!

If I told you that I had the answers to most of the world’s current problems, would you care to listen??????

Well, I’ve got it, and for $free.99 (I stole that from a Kanye song, sorry) I’ll share my secret.

Its respect. Its that simple.

I’m sure that each and everyone of you could find many things to disagree with me about. I encourage that. Maybe you can change my mind (probably not). I try to respect your position, and I hope you respect mine. That doesn’t mean either of us is evil. Most of us want the same thing (A peaceful, healthy and prosperous world), sometimes we just have different ideas about how to achieve the objective.

When I started this blog, I wanted to open up a forum for debate. Yeah, I’m more conservative than liberal on a lot of things, but I’m more liberal than conservative on others. I hoped this wouldn’t be like many of the other conservative blogs (I’m a Libertarian, for the record), where it generally resorts to name calling and motive accusations.

I don’t really see the same trend in many of the more liberal blogs I read, and that makes me feel bad for the conservative movement. Usually when its there on the liberal blogs, its one of those conservative profiles doing the accusing and name calling.

Senator Barry Goldwater’s movement deserves more than this!

Recently, I’ve had some trouble with one of my readers (I’m not going to promote him, but if you read my blogs, you know who I’m talking about), who I personally think is a fraud. I know, I know, I’ve had several people tell me this, and I’d already “outed” him on his blog (he took those posts down). I’ve sent several messages to this profile, and he’s yet to come clean.

Either way, I wish he’d pick on someone else.

If he’s a fraud, then this isn’t the type of place he should be concentrating on. I promote debate here.

If he’s for real, its still a joke. But either way, its not funny. I laid into him pretty hard, because I want to send a message that this type of thing isn’t tolerated here.

Anyway, I implore my conservative friends to discuss the issues. Name calling will never convince someone of your position. I’d give the same advice to my liberal friends as well.

From what I’ve seen, most of us LOVE IT and would never want to LEAVE IT so we all need to figure out a way to make the American Experiment a more perfect union, the goal our founding fathers shared.

As always, thanks for the comments, keep them coming!!
Make sure to visit The-G-Blog on the net








Friday, May 4, 2007

Happy Independence Day. In honor, I'm posting an audio blog. Listen to The Hawg Pen's recent conversation with Raymond McKinney, who is seeking The Repulican Party's nomination for President of The United States.

Mr. McKinney is not an independent candidate, but he has an independent streak, and some positions that I think could be described as "independent".



The Fair Tax: Why Won't Republicans Support It

Its fair to say that we need more debates. We have enough candidates to choose from, and I don’t think many people who hadn’t decided who they support before the debates were convinced. I think that’s good.

It’s okay if you have a chosen a candidate to support, as well, but not all of us have made up our mind yet. I’ve got a feeling candidates aren’t done throwing their hat in the ring for 2008, so maybe I’ll keep my options open.

As many of you know, I am a supporter of the Fair Tax. Governor Huckabee mentioned his support for the Fair Tax tonight, as did Governor Tancredo. Senator Mike Gravel has also pledged his support for the Fair Tax.

I did some quick research on these three candidates to see more of their thoughts.

I had trouble finding Mike Huckabee’s official website. A Google search revealed his exploratory site, and some fan pages, but no “official” Huckabee for president site. Weird! Let me know if I’m wrong

Anyway, none of these pages mention the Fair Tax, and his exploratory site mentions signing the No-Tax pledge, but this isn’t the Fair Tax

Governor Tancredo does appear to have an official site. It states that he supports either a flat tax or a national sales tax, but does not mention the Fair Tax

Senator Mike Gravel, however does support the Fair Tax, on his official site. Its on the 2nd line of his issues, on the front page.

I did some research to see Rep Ron Paul’s position. There is no official position, but from what I’ve read, he won’t support it because its revenue neutral. His supporters should explain to him that this is a tax that you choose to pay, so it can be a tax cut if you want it to be.. Its your decision, and I think he could respect that

So, a Democrat is the only major Candidate that specifically supports the Fair Tax. Why is that? This is a conservative idea, but conservatives won’t support it.

Is this a case of another Democrat who’s willing to step up, and actually address the issue with ideas, while Republicans scramble for wiggle room? I think it is, and it’s why I don’t generally vote Republican.

One of many, many reasons!!

Wednesday, May 2, 2007

A Compassionate Deficit

I would like to personally thank your children for funding my government.

Thanks!

Ronald Reagan did it. George HW Bush did it. Bill Clinton.. (oh yeah that's right he had a surplus at the end of his 2nd term). George W. Bush is doing it. Why is the only time we've had a balanced budget in the last 26 years was when a Democrat was President? (Don't bother with "Bill Clinton had a Republican congress" bull-poop. So did President W. Bush, and they all had veto power)

Maybe the Republicans don't care about your children (well, after they're born, anyway.)
I had a good deal of credit card debt when I was in college. The government won't let me make my children pay for that. Why? I mean because I went to college, I'll make more money, so my kids will have a better education, and in turn make even more money. Why not make them pay for that privilege? That seems to be the American way of late.

We have soldiers overseas fighting for our freedom, and we're told if we don't support them, we're un-American. I'm afraid they're funding themselves, they just have to do it with interest. To me, that's not supporting the troops, in the most literal sense. And its not like even when Congress funds them, they get the equipment they need, and deserve. We have the ability to protect our troops from roadside bombs, we just can't get them on their vehicles.

Whitney Houston believes the children are our future. President Bush believes the children are our financiers. I have to agree with Ms. Houston on this one

Tuesday, May 1, 2007

Gangsta's Paradise Remix

I found this video, and it may be old news (I seem to behind on some of my posts, forgive me, I'm still pretty new).

I wanted to post this, and see what thoughts my readers have to say. I'm honestly not sure what to think. Its very interesting.


Gangstas Paradise Remix


Monday, April 30, 2007

So You Say You Want A Healthcare Revolution? Libertarians and Health care


Well, we all want to change the world.

But there is a better way. Now I’m sure my liberal and conservative friends can agree (finally, The-G-Blog, a uniter, not a divider) that the current way is not working. So do we let the government step in to once again solve our problems (like the war on drugs, like the prescription drug plan, etc).

Healthcare is outrageous. So is health insurance. So why shouldn’t the Federal Government implement a plan to solve the crisis?

Because they’ll make it worse, that’s why.

The government requires insurance carriers to carry certain coverages on all policies they sell. So if you are a 70 year old female who’s had your tubes tied, most likely you are required to buy pregnancy coverage through your healthcare provider, I guess just in case. Silly requirements like these drive the price up. You can’t go out and get a simple policy that covers an unexpected loss. Not because these policies wouldn’t make money, but because the state requires them to add on extra coverages, which cost extra

What about the cost?

If you have healthcare insurance through your company, the company pays about 50% of that premium (on average). So when we move to Government healthcare, your taxes will need to be increased by 2x the amount you pay now toward healthcare. And do you think that once competition is eliminated, the hospitals are going to lower their price?. Is that what we need, solve the problem by doubling our burden? I say not.

Now, I’m all for a non-profit healthcare program sponsored by the government to offer basic healthcare to those who don’t get it through their company. I would also like to see a safety net for those who couldn’t afford the premiums that the non-profit program provided. Call me the libertarian Dennis Kucinich if you will.

We should concentrate on Tort reform, more competition, and less government intervention. It’s the American way... Or at least it used to be!!